You are browsing the archive for pronography.

Holyoke Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf to Resign

2016/04/05 in Chateauneuf, Council, Facebook, Panitch, pronography


Good Bye


She claims to be done with he said / she said but yet she still continues in that mode in this public resignation.  Not surprising.  She really should apologize to the person that she attempted to frame and to the City of Holyoke for her absolute embarrassment of our wonderful city. I do hope that her seat is soon filled by someone who holds a respect for the Constitution and for the people that the post represents.

What next?

From the Holyoke Charter:

If the full number of members of the city council has not been elected, or if a vacancy in the office of councilor shall occur more than six months previous to the expiration of the municipal year, the city council may forthwith elect a person to fill such vacancy until the next municipal election.

Previous election results puts Mimi Panitch as a likely candidate here:

Peter R. Tallman (winner) 5476
Joseph M. McGiverin (winner) 4988
James M. Leahy (winner) 4575
Daniel B. Bresnahan (winner) 4286
Howard B. Greaney Jr. (winner) 3845
Michael J. Sullivan (winner) 3833
Jennifer E. Chateauneuf (winner) 3803
Rebecca Lisi (winner) 3799
Mimi Panitch 3021
James F. Brunault 2828
Jordan M. Lemieux 2660
Adrian K. Dahlin 1925
Darlene Elias 1836
Mike Franco 1730
Anne N. Thalheimer 1197
Jemma B. Penberthy 859



Response to Councilor Chateauneuf Redux

2016/04/04 in Absurd, Alex Morse, Chateauneuf, HPD, Lawsuit, Lies, Masslive, pronography



Yeah, for me this was well over in November 2015.  By then I had pretty much made my point and brought attention to Councilor Chateauneuf’s misdeeds using social media – to a very limited audience.  Then came the two show of cause hearings and the no contact / no harass 258E order – Councilor Chateauneuf was trying to call my actions “harassment” which were actually constitutionally protected free and political speech.  I defeated her in court.  So, again, on January 14th, I’m done.  I win three times.  You lose three times.  I consider this issue to be over with.

But oh, no, it cannot be over! Councilor Chateauneuf needs to hold a press conference because she has not had enough attention.  Then another one because she did not like the response from the first one.  The story languished in the media for a week and people were now made aware that she took someone to court for absolutely no reason and that she uses the police as her personal gestapo.  Largely the response was “what the fuck is her malfunction?”.  Certainly not the best idea on her part to make this public, but it saved me the effort as I was then planning on coming forward after the last court date to detail in a blog post her attempt to suppress free and political speech.  When all was laid bare by Councilor Chateauneuf herself  it was obvious that she was overreacting and abusing her power.  Additionally, her public performance was absolutely absurd.  When you were not laughing you probably had some amount of pity for her because it was obvious that she was flailing and totally not prepared for public service or criticism that might come with it. –  I have asked the question before:  Why is she even there?

So now comes the Chamber of Commerce breakfast event.  This event traditionally has it’s share of roasting.  Mayor Alex Morse makes a joke about not making a joke about her because she’d sue him if he actually did make one:

“Councilor Chatenauf isn’t here this morning. I was going to make a joke about her but I didn’t want to get sued for harassment. God forbid someone say something negative about an elected official on social media.”

Accurate, timely, funny and she 100% deserves it.  Well, Councilor Chateauneuf goes on Facebook to tell everyone that the Mayor is unkind and should not be joking about SERIOUS BUSINESS because someone using a drone took a photo of her naked in her own bathroom – a story that she tried to pin on me in court and a story that has been spread throughout the community in order do defame me.


It is shared with reporter Mike Plaisance to follow up, which is reasonable after all; this is a serious offense that she is suggesting and if anyone is flying a drone around taking clandestine nude photos that is something that the public should be made aware.  The problem is that the story is not at all true.  So, again Masslive published a story and here was my response.

My response to Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf’s false claims of clandestine drone photography.

If you are going to attempt to frame someone by fabricating a story about a clandestine photo taken by drone of a person naked in their shower it is most certainly a good idea to submit as evidence an actual photo of that person naked in their shower and not a photo of some random person found on the internet. I guess we all should not be surprised here; and if you have been paying attention you will know that this is what I have been trying to tell you all along – these people are not the brightest bulbs on the Holiday Tree. While we do not know who sent the photo to her or if she has manufactured this absurd plot herself; I was, albeit briefly, believing that there was an actual drone photo of her, naked, out there in the wild. So, while this creation lacks the technical skills needed to convince HPD – nor should it convince anyone – I will say that Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf might be deserving an Academy Award for her public performance.

When I first heard about the “drone photo” I was very concerned. Is someone out there invading privacy and committing what amounts to sex crimes via drone photography here in Holyoke? If this were true, then yeah, I would be 100% sympathetic to Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf – or anyone, for that matter – because this would indeed be a serious violation. She tried to pin it on me twice in court – mind you, we find out now that this was weeks after the police told her the photo was not of her; that the photo was not of the inside her own bathroom; that the photo was not by drone; that the photo in question was not even a photo but instead a screen-print from an amateur porn website. When she mentioned it in the no contact order hearing and in the show of cause hearing she told the judge and the magistrate that she had received photos of herself naked; in her bathroom; and possibly taken by drone. She testified to this story to bolster her harassment case against me. Testimony that would have had criminal implications beyond harassment – a charge that could possibly result in making me a registered sex offender. However, nothing was submitted as evidence. Why? We now know that this is because the official police report would indicate that her story was not true!

It should be noted that in the police report that she claims that she had “no problems with anyone until recent times with that individual”. This is not at all true. Not only did I receive support from many in my efforts to expose her misdeeds, there were also others that gave negative reviews of her business over her politics and one individual that threatened on Twitter to picket her business – on public property, the sidewalk – this individual was also visited by HPD multiple times and received a No Trespass Order from her.

Additionally, Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf in her multiple press conferences and in her social media post criticizing the Mayor she continues to use the word “harassment”. This is another one of her lies. This was tested in court three times and there were no charges of harassment resulting from “hot dog memes” or my criticism of Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf, an elected person that represents me:

The definition of “harassment” in c. 258E was crafted by the Legislature to “exclude constitutionally protected speech,” and to limit the categories of constitutionally unprotected speech that may qualify as “harassment” to two: “fighting words” and “true threats.” To qualify as “fighting words” the words “must be a direct personal insult addressed to a person, and they must be inherently likely to provoke violence.” As for “true threats,” these include “direct threats of imminent physical harm,” as well as “words or actions that — taking into account the context in which they arise — cause the victim to fear such [imminent physical] harm now or in the future.”

Attempting to suppress free speech. Using the police as an armed enforcement wing of her campaign. Using her position to call press conferences in order to attack an individual that challenged her and the Mayor for not providing support of her false claims. Now we learn of her continued spreading of this absurd tale despite the police report officially debunking it. Councilor Jennifer Chateauneuf’s behavior is unbecoming of an elected official. She should immediately resign and issue a public apology to me and to the City of Holyoke.


If this story is proof of anything besides Chateauneuf’s gross ignorance, incredibly thin skin and her abuse of power it is that we need to start teaching civics in schools again.  If not that then we should have some sort of orientation for new public officials about how to respond to criticism from the public when it happens and what the bill of rights means in terms of political speech. Chateauneuf’s behavior proves that it’s possible for people to be elected without really understanding what they’re getting themselves in for.  It is a bit of a surprise sine it only takes a glance at the internet to see what people can and will say about national figures. And while there’s obviously a difference between being a city councilor in a small mill city and being, say, Hillary Clinton, there are material similarities here.  Or we could go the opposite way – forget the Constitution – instead limit speech and limit protest.  We could be headed that way, as this nation forever creeps closer towards fascism with every election.

My response to Councilor Chateauneuf

2016/02/02 in Absurd, Chateauneuf, City Council, Civil Rights, Classism, Holyoke, Lawsuit, Masslive, Mike Plaisance, pronography


One of the offensive images.

Sent to Mike Plaisance on 02/01/2016 in response to the story he was drafting which can now be found posted here.


This is all ridiculous, but I do want to thank Councilor Chateauneuf for creating such spectacularly absurd political theater here. Very well done; and I do hope that it may it come back to bite you next election cycle. This all reminds me of another councilor who- when upset with a PhotoShop I created portraying her as “The Joker”- (as you surely have seen many times over with elected officials at all levels) went on a public tirade and abused assets like email lists to smear me for poking fun at her. Well, that only ended up with an at-large councilor that normally won in the top five of eight seats falling off the map that next election. And this really is what this is all about here – not just Councilor Chateauneuf. I heard it once from Councilor Chateauneuf in the courtroom, and again in a conversation with Lt. James Albert, “you harass people” and “he has gone after several councilors”, etc. Yes, I lampoon, poke fun at and have exposed crimes and misdeeds of several local politicians – and this has contributed to at least three of them losing election. This was all via a long tradition of free and political speech in this country – making fun of politicians is as American as apple pie, racism and police brutality. And these pols all should have lost because they were clearly not suited for the post. Public criticism is a concern for people like Councilor Chateauneuf; and it is her lack of understanding of the Bill of Rights and civics that shall be her undoing.

Some may wonder why I went after Councilor Chateauneuf and Nick’s Nest. Well, there are several reasons. First, the long history of Holyoke electing unqualified political hacks that get elected on name recognition only or for their connection to certain cliques in the city. There are several on the City Council at this moment. I heard a number of people say that she won because she “saved Nick’s Nest”. No, she bought an established successful business and did not fundamentally change what was was already a formula that worked. This does not really take any sort of savvy, certainly does not amount to a “saving” and not qualification one for office. Second, she does nothing on council. Often when she does speak she frames it in her experience at Nick’s Nest as if that place is a barometer for all things Holyoke – it is not. In that, she opposed the meals tax – an order that I supported –and similar such revenue programs have been successfully implemented in neighboring cities and towns and will provide our city with much needed tax revenue. Third, she supported an anti-panhandling ordinance in Holyoke. This is another attempt of hers to quell free speech. Any lawmaker that is paying attention should know that anti-panhandling ordinances have been shut down in at least three other Massachusetts cities after costly ACLU lawsuits. Not only that, she suggested that if we could not create an ordinance that we should find a way to shame them. The council, which is mostly white, already does not represent the 48% Latino population – now here we have classist comments like hers while near one third of the population lives below the poverty line. This is not acceptable. Lastly, Nick’s Nest is gross and the describing a restaurant on the website and in commercials as “good for kids”, a restaurant that does not sell a single healthy item on its menu, is indeed false advertising.

As far as her claims of sexual harassment: Councilor Chateauneuf has brought me to court three times. Twice for show of cause hearings and once for a no-contact / no-harass order. She lost in all three. The Honorable Maureen Walsh said it best: “I can think of a lot of things that I could say to describe Mr. Bickford’s work here, but one of them is not harassment.” Not harassment and clearly not sexual harassment. In the show of cause hearings the magistrate compared my creating of memes to those that have flooded review websites like Yelp and Trip Advisor over the political positions made by private businesses. We have all seen this, a wedding cake baker refuses to service gay marriages or a business claims to not serve Muslims and they get thousands of negative reviews in response. Also, I am not alone in targeting Nick’s Nest: there were others that gave Nick’s Nest one star reviews due to her politics. In forums and on Twitter one Holyoke citizen stated that they were going to picket her restaurant (on public property, the sidewalk across the street) over her classist comments – and in Councilor Chateauneuf‘s scorn she sent him a preemptive no-trespass order. Also, Councilor Chateauneuf said it herself, “a hot dog that looked like a penis”. Yes, hot dogs are made with lips and buttholes, do indeed look phallic and jokes are often made about “wieners”. Pointing that out is not “sexual” unless the context is clearly a sex act or the person viewing the image has some sado-sexual fixation. If the fact that you sell hot dogs bothers you that much you are in the wrong business. If political commentary and lampooning related to your political post results in your seeking to suppress free speech then you are again in the wrong business.

As far as your request that I be removed from posts in the city; from unpaid, volunteer positions on understaffed committees where I can provide valuable work (Holyoke Local Cultural Council, Cable Advisory Board and Holyoke Creative Arts Center) – Well, this plays into another one of your political games. We all know you do not support our Mayor and you’d love to put him in a pickle like you are trying to here. The problem is that you are so out of touch. My service on the Holyoke Local Cultural Council ended and while I could have re-upped I decided not to as I am too busy with other projects. The Cable Advisory Board was created to negotiate the new contract with Comcast and technically dissolved after we did so two and a half years ago. The Holyoke Creative Arts Center is a non-profit in the city, is not a municipal entity and the Mayor does not make appointments.

I already have taken the first steps to suing HPD and the city over Councilor Chateauneuf‘s use of the police as an armed enforcement wing of her campaign. I will also be going to the State Ethics Committee with a similar complaint. Your press conference and call for my removal from posts only adds to my case. Thank you.


One thing that I left out, that was mentioned by her was the fact that I did send an email before this all escalated.  It was a polite and reasonable email explaining my concerns about the panhandling ordinance and her sending the HPD to my home for what amounted to three images posted to FB, one attached to a negative review of Nick’s Nest.   I am her constituent and she failed to respond – which should be her duty to do so.  Had she responded this may not have escalated.

Councilor Chateauneuf claims these images / videos to be “sexual” in nature.  Please review.  In her letter to the Mayor she cites:

sexy tube meat


sad hot dogs

This is actually a vintage WTF internet image. I have no idea what is happening here and I am not aware of there ever being any explanation for this image. Hot or not?


When this one was presented in the courtroom I said: "yeah, I made this, this one is my favorite." Hot or not?



This is a video from a Filipino band called “Hot Dog”.  That is a tongue coming out of the radio (not a jukebox) on the album cover.  Councilor Chateauneuf is the one that sees something else.  Yeah, it does kinda look like like a penis now that she mentions it, but it is also clearly not.  Hot or not?

Additionally, Western Mass News felt the need to censor this image. Why? Is it indeed lewd or are they trying to make it appear that way for the folks that would only see the edited version? And why censor the text? So that people could not search for the original? It makes no sense, that is clearly an anthropomorphic radio sticking its tongue out.



Crude? Yes. Sexual? No. Hot or not?



This is a still from a gif (not a Vine as was suggested). It reminds me of a video from cyriak ( ). It is strange. Not at all sexual. It is also not a hot dog. Rather, it appears to be a popsicle. Hot or not?

These images and videos are clearly not sexual… unless, as I stated above, you have some sado-sexual fixation with tube meat.  Her accusations are nothing but surreal and the fact that her attorney would come out and make statements like he did on television is absolutely bizarre.  Also, Councilor Chateauneuf and her attorney make claims about children viewing such images on Facebook.  Hello, forget the fact that these images are not “sexual” as you suggest, please remember that Facebook is 13+.

Lastly, the Mayor’s response to Councilor Chateauneuf’s requests is nothing short of an “FU”:

Important issues in Holyoke?  How about protecting free speech Councilor Chateauneuf’?  That’s such an important issue that it is #1 in the Bill of Rights.  You do not send the police to people’s homes over silly posts on Facebook.  Unless you want us to instead embrace fascism?  Looking at the dialog in the national election I guess I should not be surprised here.  .


Check Out This Douchebag.

2015/07/25 in Bresnahan, City Council, Elections, Franco, Masslive, McGee, pronography, pronosound, Sexism, Shame


In case you do not know this knuckle-dragger’s story, when he’s not being arrested for missing jury duty Mike Franco has been a serial candidate and serial loser in almost every election for the past decade or so running for a number of posts from Governor’s Council, State Senate, State Representative, Animal Control Officer – and now he’s running for At-Large City Council in Holyoke.  Nobody is really certain where he lives because he’s run from East Longmeadow, Springfield, Chicopee and Holyoke.  Franco is an MRA, Donald Trump fan, Conspiracy Theorist, Tea Party Extremist and an adult man that cannot grow a decent mustache.  As you’d expect his platform is something like : everyone that does not work is lazy, feminism is worse than Nazism, Obama the “socialist” is building reeducation camps and everyone that does not agree with Mike Franco should move to France.  That’s him in a nutshell (pun intended).

Many may remember that wonderful hot mic indecent back in October of 2013 where misogynists Todd Murphy McGee and Daniel Breezy-D Bresnahan let the world know what kind of assholes they are when they spoke the truth at a time that they thought nobody could hear.  It was comedy, but it was also very disturbing…  My recording of this event was picked up by local and regional news, some popular feminist and some political blogs.  It really shamed these two man-children as they deserved but it also exposed what is most certainly a hostile work environment inside those council chambers.  Now, almost two years later and as promised a much needed training was scheduled for all on City Council to attend.

So, here is Franco’s first salvo at who he’s deemed to be a political opponent.  As a result of the the training that Franco calls “forced and potentially iron-fisted indoctrination training” and councilor Jossie Valentin’s suggestion that the session be open to the public he lashes out at her:

Classy, Franco...

What a fucking jerk, huh?  He’d certainly fit in with those other two morons in council… that is if he could ever win.  I can only assume that he’s just comic relief in this election…  not very good at it, but he tries his best.

You can read his entire post HERE on Franco’s 2014 State Senate campaign page.  In the event that he removes this post I have archived it HERE at and HERE as a screen capture.




Diversity in Holyoke

2014/10/01 in Absurd, History, Holyoke, pronography

Not diverse enough?

“Paint a couple of fucking shamrocks on the thing and shut the fuck up!”

Dan Bresnahan: The Most Interesting Man-Child in Holyoke

2013/10/04 in Bresnahan, Elections, H.U.S.H., McGee, pronography, Sexism, Shame


The most interesting man-child in Holyoke.

Please play the theme music while admiring this image:

The War on Sesame Street

2012/10/05 in Absurd, Elections, Federal, H.U.S.H., Lies, Neoliberalism, Press, pronography

Meanwhile We Ignore The Snuffleupagus In The Room

(I added a few things and people / puppets to this image.  See if you can spot them all.)

Sometimes the Democrats surpass all understanding – not the politicians themselves, rather their supporters. Republicans, they always make a certain kind of logical sense. If to be a total asshole requires doing A, B and C, you can be pretty sure the Republicans will make it platform and proceed forth with A, B and C to the fullest. But the Dems?  They do the exact same thing as the Republicans and get away with it.  Why?  Their actions do not get resistance from their opposition because they are doing what the Republicans would want.  Republican leaders cannot make noise here as they would appear soft to their base and then lose political capital in the fear department.  However, if McCain made it to office then liberals would be in the streets protesting and their pundits would be denouncing the attacks on labor, the use of drones, extra-judicial executions of US citizens, escalation of war and the oppressive attack on 1st Amendment rights on the home-front via the NDAA and the Patriot Act.  Why then, would there be the noise if roles were reversed and Democrats were not in power?  Democrats only demonize crimes against humanity when they are not the ones committing them – if you do not talk about it then it is as if they are not happening!  So, instead we talk about Big Bird.  Bravo.  What a fucking distraction.  As much as it is so far from what should be discussed in the public sphere I gotta say it is brilliant in its powerful manipulation of the message.  Bernays would be getting an erection right about now.  Yes, to be fair it was indeed Romney that started this conversation, but the media and the party PR machines are crafting the public dialog and I am certain that Romney is as much pleased as Obama that we are not focusing on our wars, income gap, drones, oil and military industrial profits.  The controlling interests that benefit from those issues are where the real campaign dollars come from.

I do miss Mr Rogers.

(Thanks to L.H. on the lifted A, B, C inspiration / plagiarism.)

Sights on Greenfield

2012/07/21 in Absurd, Council, Greenfield, H.U.S.H., Homophobia, Mailbag, pronography, Quote

Meet Greenfield City Councilor Brickett Allis.

On a Facebook discussion here is what Brickett had to say about the Boy Scouts of America members recent protest where Eagle Scouts are returning their badges in response to the BSA stated anti-gay discrimination policy.

Copy / Pasted exactly as it appeared:

“you know what I would say to this! I resent that base on your opinion you woudl ellude to the fact that if we don’t send them back we are somehow homophobic. thats a bunch of shit this makes me pretty mad.   look im not a homophobe, but i am a realist, you put gay men in a group of other boys/men there is a higher liklihood that it could lead to any number of things some of which may not be appropriate…….exactly the same point as you put a group of heterosexual men in a room with women and they tend to do things that may or may not be appropriate. the issue is that scouting is not teaching boys its wrong to be gay, they are taking the same stance the millitary did don’t ask dont tell and i know you wont agree but i think its the right stance. secondly scouts is based in part on being reverent to god, and like it or not that god was the christian god the one that that all you libbies out there cant stand. and based on that god and that religion homosexuallity is not okay. do i give a shit about what someone is??? NO!!! but that goes across the board i dont care if you are fucking a horse just shut up about it and there will be no problem. if no one talked we would all be equal. but unfortunately everyone wants to make a “point” about thier sexuality. and the underlying message of this picture is to say that the only “good scouts” are the ones that send back their awards. well good for them feel free to feel better about yourself, i personally dont care how these morons sending them back feel. I just hope that they get enough back that they can send them back out free of charge to the new eagle scouts. this whole fiasco I find disgusting!”

Link to a full resolution screenshot from Facebook.

Fucking brilliant!  Only a cartoon character could say it better.





2012/04/06 in Art, H.U.S.H., Holyoke, pronography, Rob Deza


Today as part of Rob Deza’s Faces of Holyoke project we (Mojo and I) were photographed by the Pine St fire demolition.

I Am Holyoke

I Am Holyoke

Rob Deza Photography

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the General Assembly

2012/03/10 in Art, Eschatology, H.U.S.H., Occupy, pronography, Weather

This was pretty damn cool.

Today I met a young woman with a beautiful smile…

She had a tattoo on her left wrist…

That she had created from a graffiti she had seen…

Which was created using one of my stencils!

(My friend Damian Cote also made a wood block cut for me.)

This just really made my day.

Full disclosure:  I made this stencil and created t-shirts as well as a few graffiti here and there.  I also released it into the wild.  I handed cut stencils to a few folks that I knew would put them ANYWHERE and they did.  I published it on the internet in a few places.  I am not sure if it appears outside of Western Mass but it may.  I painted it on sidewalks, lampposts, power conduits and telephone poles…  never on private property.  I say this because I have seen it somewhere I would not have done myself.   Not me!

I created this stencil back in 2007.  For those that are not aware, those creatures are kodama (tree spirits) and, of course, the date was at the time what I thought would be a hot topic as it approached…  or that people would make it a dialog and I was doing my part to make it so?  There really is no relevant connection between the image of kodama and the 2012 date when I created the image.  It was made solely to have people ask “why”?  But now that I look at it today I imagine that there is a sort of man versus nature / our time is up scenario.  After I saw the tattoo I arrived home to read some extremely depressing news.  We have witnessed the first ever migration due to climate change circumstances.  The Micronesian nation of Kiribati (population 100,000) has relocated to Fiji due to rising sea levels.  Also, a few weeks ago I read that the rate of extinction on this planet was 1000X what the normal rate was except for an Extinction Level Event (ELE – like an ice age, caldera or asteroid hitting the Earth – something that would kill 20-90% of life).  Essentially meaning that the human species’ behavior on this earth is approaching that of a disaster.

I still act as if things can be and are worth saving even though part of me believes that this house of cards will soon fall; that we are on a path to destruction well past any tipping point that we should have been paying heed to for a long time.  I don’t know, is it true?  Eschatology provides many possibilities from a number of faiths and prophecy.  However, I do know one thing; I am not at all afraid.  If there is some sort of cataclysm or apocalypse that will bring humanity to its close I want a first class front row seat.  I have indeed seen it all.  Sure, more experiences are appreciated…  but is there a point?  Don’t get me wrong, I am not some New Age freak that believes that some Mayan prophecy is our end.  I am simply wishing that there was one to prepare for as that would give me comfort that we (all living things) might actually come together, for once… if only for the end.

Thank you HFD and HPD!

2012/03/07 in Eschatology, Fire, H.U.S.H., HFD, HPD, pronography

Many thanks to the Holyoke Fire Department and Police for their hard work last night.


Last night four buildings were taken out by fire in my neighborhood.  I awoke to the sounds of police knocking on the door of my neighbor shouting “Get out, get out!  FIRE!”  Within minutes I could feel the heat from my porch and in less than an hour a two story house was a pile of mud and charred debris only a few feet tall.  A change in wind to a more westerly direction would have surely had my home at risk.  At 3am my 7yo daughter was literally floating around the room on her tiptoes bug-eyed and chanting “we have got to get out of here” .   It was crazy, but thankfully nobody was hurt.

View from my backyard

View from my neighbor’s backyard

From 3am to 10am four hoses blasted this building on Pine St.

This morning

This may seem silly in the light of such devastation but HUSH would like to honor the hard work by our public servants so we will be providing them with a supply of tasty treats from the BYOR kitchen.
To the right on the sidebar you will see a poll.  Please vote…
So what will it be?



Or cookies?

H.U.S.H. in the Advocate again.

2011/12/28 in Activism, Art, At-large, C.R.U.S.H., Casino, Chickens, Elections, H.U.S.H., Holyoke, Mailbag, Patti Devine, Press, pronography

The Halos and Horns edition gives Patti Devine her second (or third?) set of horns; this time for her bullying of CRUSH to censor my work.

Thanks to the Advocate for your continued support of Holyoke and your stand-up defense of free expression.

…and special thanks to Patti.  What would we do without a nemesis?  I am indeed somewhat sad that you lost.  You were inspiration.  Most of all, thank you for coining the term ‘pronography‘.  That was brilliant.  I hope you have a happy New Year.

For those arriving for the first time here is the back story:

Meet Our Founder

H.U.S.H. in the news

H.U.S.H. Mailbag

Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! Thank You!

H.U.S.H. in the Advocate again.

Potty Divine




Occupy HCC

2011/11/13 in Activism, Art, H.U.S.H., HCC, Occupy, Politics, Press, pronoblem, pronography

OCCUPY an impromptu peoples art show

I will have two pieces in this show.  Stop by Thursday Nov 17, 5:30 – 7:30 for the reception.

Taber Gallery Holyoke Community College


Occupy Holyoke

2011/11/04 in Activism, Anarchism, Art, H.U.S.H., Holyoke, Jobs, Occupy, Politics, Press, pronoblem, pronography

Poster I made for a local Occupy art show…  300dpi for print quality available to those that are at OWS events.

Holyoke Charter

2011/11/01 in Bresnahan, Charter, Council, Elections, H.U.S.H., History, Holyoke, Politics, pronography

 Industria Et Copia

(Elizur Holyoke and the Founding Fathers of Holyoke create our beloved charter)

H.U.S.H. is opposed to the Charter Change due to its broad reach and numerous undesirable changes.  I can agree with only one measure in the proposed charter and that is a 4-year term for mayor.  This could happen without the charter proposal being passed.

Read the charter for yourself HERE. (if someone could send me a translated Spanish version in PDF please do)

There exists a Facebook Page called Holyoke Charter Change NO that lays out these reasons to opposition:

VOTE NO on the Proposed Charter Change:

Holyoke cannot afford this risky proposal!

Dear Fellow Voter:

There is going to be a referendum question on this year’s ballot  that proposes to change our City Charter and it has lots of fine print you are not being told about. This risky proposal would:

Weaken Voter Power:

  • Voters will no longer elect the City Clerk or City Treasurer
  • Voters will no longer elect a majority of their City Councilors
  • Only vote for the Mayor every 4 years not every 2 years which could be problematic especially if you get someone who is not doing a good job.

Eliminate Checks and Balances:

  • We already have a very strong Mayor: we should not consolidate nearly all power in one person!
  • Proposes to weaken the City Council and make the Mayor even more powerful
  • Mayor would appoint the Assessors, Tax Collector, Auditor and Treasurer instead of the City Council therefore eliminating the independence of their financial oversight roles.
  • Abolishes most city commissions including the Public Works and Fire Commissions and gives those powers to the Mayor. Also makes the Mayor a member of most remaining commissions.
  • Allows the Mayor to abolish or create any city department without the Council having the opportunity to amend the proposal.
  • Terms of office of city department heads are eliminated and they would serve at pleasure of the Mayor.
  • Recommends eliminating non-political civil service independence for city employees
  • Allows the Mayor to appoint a majority of the future commissions who will review our city charter and our city ordinances.

Make Expensive Changes we cannot afford in these tough economic times:

  • Gives the Mayor a 14% pay raise from $85,000 to $97,000 per year.
  • Creates a New Chief Financial Officer position appointed by the Mayor that would likely cost over $100,000 per year.
  • The proposed new charter is a risky exploration into a new form of government which no one fully knows for sure how it would work and could be the source of expensive future litigation.

Make other foolish changes:

  • The War Memorial Commission would no longer be made up exclusively of veterans.
  • Makes it harder for citizens to run for office and get on the ballot.
  • Eliminates Residency Requirements for city department heads.

Instead of making some simple common sense changes the voters could easily understand, the Charter Commission scrapped our entire charter for a new 53 page confusing and harmful form of government. Their proposal is so complex and confusing that it reads more like mortgage then a referendum. Holyoke’s voters deserve better!

Please Vote NO on the Proposed Charter Change and protect our city!